<\/p>\n
A very common complaint from IP owners is the extremely long time it\u00a0takes to obtain a final decision in an IP infringement action or a patent invalidation or trademark cancellation case.<\/p>\n
The purpose of this post is explaining the structure of IP litigation in Mexico, and of the appeals system in this field of law; why appeals have been taking so long in being decided; why they may take longer; why the courts appear to be so unreasonably formalistic about the authority of the officials of the Mexican Patent and Trademark Office that decide cases; and what can we expect in the close future.<\/p>\n
In Mexico, most IP litigation involves administrative instances, such as the Mexican Patent and Trademark Office.<\/p>\n
It is possible to file criminal charges in connection to trademark forgery and illegal reproduction of works protected by copyright, and file actions for damages with a civil court, and the Mexican Patent and Trademark Office would have little involvement, if any, in these sorts of procedures.<\/p>\n
However, administrative cases involving infringement and invalidation of IP rights largely outnumber the matters currently handled by the General Attorney\u2019s Office and the criminal and civil courts, thus this post with make only reference to the administrative litigation.<\/p>\n
Having said the above, the basic structure of an IP litigation process is the following:<\/p>\n
A. The first instance is the Instituto Mexicano de la Propiedad Industrial<\/em> or Mexican Patent and Trademark Office (MPTO).<\/strong><\/p>\n The MPTO not only issues patents and registers trademarks; it also has authority to decide infringement actions involving patents, trademarks and some cases of copyright, and the invalidation or cancellation of patents and trademarks.<\/p>\n An infringement or cancellation or invalidation action involves a full administrative trial, with the filing of a complaint, and answer, filing and review of evidence, final arguments and a decision.<\/p>\n The MPTO typically takes from 10 to 18 months to decide a trademark cancellation\/infringement action. A patent infringement\/invalidation action may take from one to three years, sometimes more, if the substantive matter of the patents is complex, as in the case of biotechnology.<\/p>\n The MPTO may not award damages or attorneys\u2019 fees. It may only impose a fine of the infringer; order the preliminary and\/or definitive seizure of infringing product issue a preliminary\/definitive order to stop the manufacture and\/or commercialization of infringing goods; or remove a trademark from the registry or invalidate the patent.<\/p>\n B. Appeals against the MPTO<\/strong><\/p>\n There are three possible ways to challenge a final decision from the MPTO, no matter if the decision is the result of litigation or of a purely administrative procedure (final rejection of a trademark or patent application).<\/p>\n B1. Administrative Review.<\/span> It is possible to file a petition for administrative review with a higher-rank official of the MPTO itself.<\/p>\n The filing of the petition for Administrative Review is optional. The appellant may choose not to file it and appeal the decision with the Tribunal Federal de Justicia Fiscal y Administrativa<\/em> or Federal Court of Tax and Administrative Affairs (FCTAA) \u2013see B2- or file an Amparo<\/em> claim (constitutional appeal) with a Federal District Court \u2013see B3-.<\/p>\n The higher rank officials of the MPTO tend to confirm the decisions, unless there was a clear procedural or formal error.<\/p>\n Filing a petition for Administrative Review using substantive arguments against the decision is usually a waste of time, or an effective way to delay a final decision, given that the MPTO may take one year or more to simply confirm the earlier decision.<\/p>\n The decision issued in connection Administrative Review may be subject of an appeal with the FCTAA (see B2) or an amparo<\/em> claim (see B3).<\/p>\n From a technical perspective, the appeal with the FCTAA and the amparo<\/em> claim are completely different procedures in nature and structure, but in order to keep it simple, I will make emphasis only in practical issues.<\/p>\n B2. Appeal with the FCTAA. <\/span>The appeal with the FCTAA is the most usual way to challenge the decisions of the MPTO. The appellant has 45 business days to file the appeal with the FCTAA.<\/p>\n The FCTAA is divided in salas<\/em> or chambers of three judges each, and a Highest Chamber of eleven judges.<\/p>\n The FCTAA started reviewing appeals concerning IP in mid 2000, as a consequence of an amendment to the Federal Law of Administrative Procedures (FLAP). Since January 2009, appeals concerning IP matters are decided by a specialized chamber.<\/p>\n The FCTAA takes between one and two years to decide an appeal. The FCTAA has authority to order the MPTO to cure some formal or procedural flaw and render a new decision, or to decide on the merits of the case instead of the MPTO.<\/p>\n The general rule is that the parties are allowed to file new evidence and arguments, not previously submitted with the MPTO. However, there is a recent non-binding decision from the Seventh Court of Appeals in Mexico City, that intends to limit the filing of new evidence and arguments to prove the use of a trademark in appeals associated to cancellation actions due lack of use*.<\/p>\n B3.<\/span><\/em> Amparo<\/em> claim.<\/span> The amparo<\/em> claim involves a constitutional review of a final authority\u2019s decision by a federal district judge to verify if there was a breach of a garant\u00eda individual<\/em> or constitutional basic right.<\/p>\n One basic constitutional right in Mexico is that all decisions should be issued in accordance to the law. If the decision breaches the law, then it may also be unconstitutional.<\/p>\n As a general rule, the consequences of the amparo<\/em> are limited to the invalidation of the authority\u2019s decision, if found against the constitution, and the issuance of a new decision, which under certain circumstances, may be subject of a new amparo<\/em> claim or an appeal with the FCTAA.<\/p>\n The amparo<\/em> was the usual way to challenge decisions from the MPTO, until mid 2000, when the amendment to the FLAP gave the FCTAA authority to review appeals against the decisions o the MPTO, among other government agencies.<\/p>\n Notwithstanding the above, the amparo<\/em> claim is still available to challenge most decisions of the MPTO, although practitioners do not use it, given the shorter time they would have to prepare the appeal. Further, the district judges tend to invalidate decisions only to order the MPTO to cure a formal or procedural flaw and render a new decision, instead of deciding the merits of the case. Finally, and from my very personal perspective, the FCTAA\u2019s decisions usually show more careful analysis of the parties\u2019 arguments than the decisions from the district judges.<\/p>\n Unlike the appeal with the FCTAA, the general rule is that the parties are not allowed to file new evidence or arguments.<\/p>\n The appellant has 15 business days to file the amparo <\/em>claim, and the judge may take from 6 to 12 months to issue a decision.<\/p>\n C. Final appeals <\/strong><\/p>\n As explained above, the decision issued by a higher rank official of the MPTO in connection to a petition for administrative review (see B1) may be challenged with the FCTAA or a federal district judge.<\/p>\n The decisions issued by the FCTAA and the district judge may be subject of a final appeal with a tribunal colegiado de circuito<\/em> or federal court of appeals, or with the Mexican Supreme Court in some extraordinary cases, such as the direct interpretation of the Federal Constitution or the constitutionality of a statute or statutory provision.<\/p>\n The final appeal may be decided by any of the seventeen courts of appeals specialized in administrative matters located in Mexico City.\u00a0A federal court of appeals takes about six to ten months to decide a final appeal. The Supreme Court may take a little longer.<\/p>\n In the second part of this post, I will explain some of the reasons why the appeals take so long to be decided, and why they may take longer.<\/strong><\/p>\n * Ninth Era, Weekly Judicial Journal of the Federation, Courts of Appeals, XXIX, April, 2009, page: 1925, Thesis: I.7o.A.617 A, Registry 167451<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" This is the first of a two parts post, explaining the structure of the appeals in IP in Mexico; why appeals have been taking so long in being decided; why they may take longer; why the courts appear to be so unreasonably formalistic about the authority of the officials of the Mexican Patent and Trademark Office that decide cases; and what can we expect in the close future.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":2028,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[294,296,297],"tags":[304,317,61,338,339,351,354,355,359,112,377,380,382,386,389,393,412,414,177,416,417,422,241,485,487,270],"class_list":["post-1611","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-copyright-law","category-patent-law","category-trademark-law","tag-amparo","tag-cancellation","tag-copyright","tag-district-court","tag-district-judge","tag-fctaa","tag-federal-court-of-appeals","tag-federal-court-of-tax-and-administrative-affairs","tag-federal-law-of-administrative-procedures","tag-impi","tag-industrial-property","tag-infringement","tag-intellectual-property","tag-invalidation","tag-inventions","tag-ip-rights","tag-mexican-patent-and-trademark-office","tag-mexican-supreme-court","tag-mexico","tag-mexico-copyright","tag-mexico-intellectual-property","tag-mpto","tag-reyes-fenig","tag-trademark-registration","tag-trademarks","tag-tribunal-colegiado-de-circuito"],"yoast_head":"\n